People For Schapelle Corby #Icare4innocentSchapelle


October 8, 2015 by socialaction2014

Why did Justice & Customs Minister Christopher Ellison withhold the
information provided to him by the CEO of Sydney Airport Corporation
Ltd, Max Moore-Wilton, specifically that Schapelle Corby’s boogie-board
bag was the only one not scanned at Sydney Airport? Given that this
confirmed that it was diverted past the scanner by baggage staff, why
didn’t he inform Schapelle Corby’s lawyer, when asked directly about
scanning, just a couple of days after he had personally discovered this?
[ref: Transit Report]
2. Why was this information also hidden
from Parliament, when direct questions were asked, and critically, from
the Bali court? Why did John Howard, who was also aware, remain silent
throughout? [ref: Transit Report]
3. Why did AFP Commissioner
Michael Keelty remain silent, particularly given that the AFP’s own
Operation Mocha had already discovered that exactly the same baggage
handlers were simultaneously engaging in other drug related activities
at the airport? [ref: Transit Report]
4. Why was Schapelle
Corby’s luggage 5kg overweight on the Qantas system (which would carry
an excess charge of $175), when she checked them in underweight (with no
excess charge)? [ref: Transit Report]
5. Why wasn’t Schapelle
Corby, or the Bali court, ever told about the addition of this weight,
after the bags left her hands, particularly given that it broadly
equated to the weight of the marijuana? [ref: Supplementary Report]

6. Why did AFP Commissioner Keelty tell the media, just two weeks
before the verdict, that there was no evidence of airport drug
syndicates using innocent passengers, when this was clearly,
demonstrably, and utterly, false? Why didn’t the AFP admit that it had
held the Kessing Reports for months, and why did it withhold a host of
other vital support evidence, which proved the long-term and systemic
nature of such syndication at Sydney Airport? Why wasn’t Keelty
disciplined or reprimanded for this intervention, even after the Law
Council of Australia pointed out that it would have constituted contempt
of court had the trial been held within Australian jurisdiction? [ref:
Transit Report]
7. Why did the AFP and DFAT evade and frustrate
the forensic and DNA tests which Schapelle Corby repeatedly begged for
in court? [ref: Mutual Evasion Report]
8. Why did the AFP tell
Parliament that it couldn’t perform marijuana pollen tests, when it had
the capacity to do so, and indeed, when it had originally offered to
perform them for the INP? Why did it refuse the services of a qualified
forensics expert, who had volunteered to perform them? [ref: Mutual
Evasion Report]
9. Why did Ellison subsequently tell a
completely false story about marijuana testing, in a written letter to a
constituent? [ref: Mutual Evasion Report]
10. Why didn’t DFAT
invoke the MACMA Treaty to obtain the chain-of-custody sample of
marijuana (for DNA testing), which Schapelle Corby formally requested,
when it could have done so within the provisions of the treaty itself?
[ref: Mutual Evasion Report]
11. Why did the AFP and Qantas
provided contradictory stories about the missing CCTV footage, which
Schapelle Corby and her mother pleaded for? Why was no footage ever
provided, from any airport, despite over 800 cameras being in situ?
[ref: Transit Report]
12. Why did Foreign Minister Downer, and
Prime Minister Howard, publicly endorse the original Bali trial, when
they were well aware that a multitude of legal and human rights abuses
had been committed throughout? [ref: Bali Trial Report]
13. Why
did Ellison publicly endorse the burning of the physical evidence,
whilst Schapelle Corby pleaded desperately for it to be preserved and
tested? [ref: Mutual Evasion Report]
14. Why did DFAT ignore and
suppress the diagnosed medical condition of a mentally ill Australian
citizen, and thus, de facto, endorse the consequential ongoing human
rights abuses inherent to her situation? [ref: Mental Health Report]

15. Why was ACLEI, when forced to examine the AFP’s role in the affair,
directly and demonstrably complicit with a serving AFP officer, in
producing a report which was an embarrassment to all parties? Why was a
functionary, who was at the heart of the Howard regime when the AFP
abuses occurred, allowed to rubber-stamp ACLEI’s bogus report? [ref:
Whitewash Report]
16. Why did the government coerce Schapelle
Corby to accept the involvement of an Australian QC, Mark Trowell, for
her appeal? Why did he then decimate the appeal by attacking her
Indonesian defence team to the media? Why, when he subsequently admitted
that he was actually working for the government, and not for Schapelle
Corby, did the government refuse to comment? Why has the precise role of
Justice & Customs Minister Ellison in this affair, Trowell’s long
term friend, never been explained? [ref: Insider Report]
17. Why
did Downer and Howard publicly describe a routine flour hoax at the
Indonesian embassy as a “murderous attack”, using a “biological agent”,
when there was no evidence whatsoever to suggest that it wasn’t benign?
Why did neither of them reveal that the note included with the flour
didn’t refer to Schapelle Corby at all, and was written in Bahasa, when
they promptly blamed it on her supporters? Why didn’t they reveal the
actual contents of the note when subsequently asked? [ref: PowderGate
18. Given that he was informed of the benign nature of
the flour at 6:35pm on the same day, by email, why didn’t Ellison alert
any of the parties necessary to prevent the false but support-wrecking
story from circulating around the world? [ref: PowderGate Report]

19. Why did the government seize Schapelle Corby’s book royalties under
Proceeds of Crime legislation, whilst she was still in legal process in
Indonesia, sending a clear signal to Jakarta and denying her the funds
for a special appeal and for vital medicine? Why did it bring the
judiciary into disrepute, by illegally extending its jurisdiction
outside Australian borders, and holding secret trials, at which
Schapelle Corby was not even represented? Why is she the only person in
the history of Australia to have royalties seized under this
legislation? [ref: Political Seizure Report]
20. Why was the
Freedom of Information Act repeatedly breached with respect to requests
made on behalf of Schapelle Corby? Why has the AFP alone spent in excess
of $1 million in frustrating efforts to obtain further evidential
information? [ref: FOI Abuse Report]
21. When asked about a
mutual assistance request on this case, made by DFAT to the United
States, why did Australia’s most senior intelligence officer state that
disclosure of the requested information to Schapelle Corby would risk
the future “flow of intelligence and threat warnings” to Australia,
which could adversely “impact on the ability of the Australian agencies
to warn the Australian government of potential threats to Australian
national security”? [ref: Case Exhibit]
22. Why did the AFP
suppressed a secret recording of two known criminals discussing the
collection of marijuana from Sydney Airport on the same day that
Schapelle Corby flew to Bali? [ref: Candidate Sources Report]

23. Why has the Commonwealth Ombudsman supported the government with
respect to every complaint ever lodged relating to Schapelle Corby by
members of the public? Why has exactly the same outcome applied to the
ACMA, the OAIC, and every other quango officially presented to the
public as a ‘watchdog’? [ref: Quango Report]
24. Why was a
prominent Private Investigator rebuffed by the Finkelstein Media Inquiry
in 2011, when he approached it with direct first-hand evidence of media
abuses with respect to Schapelle Corby and her family, including
criminal matters such as phone hacking and illegal recording? [ref:
Media Reports]
25. Why did the Attorney-General refuse to accept
a formal Crime Report in 2012, including a 450 page evidential
addendum, which documented serious breaches of the law by named
politicians and the AFP? [ref: Crime Report]
26. When Schapelle
Corby’s release presented the threat that she may expose the above
information on national television, why did the AFP launch a series of
intimidatory and illegal raids, by dozens of armed officers, on the
offices of Seven Network? Why did the AFP similarly raid the offices of
Mercedes Corby’s lawyers, seizing everything in sight, including
confidential material on potential legal action against the AFP itself?
Why did the AFP lie to a magistrate to secure the necessary signature to
authorize the raids? [ref: Case Exhibits]
27. Subsequent to the
AFP raids, when Schapelle Corby was illegally gagged in Indonesia and
told that she would be re-imprisoned if she spoke to the media, why did
her own government endorse this flagrant breach of human rights through
its absolute silence? Why did ministers refuse to complain or protest,
even when her sister, Mercedes Corby, was similarly gagged? [ref: Case
28. Why has the government steadfastly refused to
intervene, despite receiving conclusive documentation evidencing an
unprecedented media campaign of cultural prejudice, unremitting abuse,
sustained vilification and blatant censorship? Why were multiple
journalists able to act in contempt of court, whilst legal proceedings
for defamation were underway against one of their colleagues? Why has
material, which demonstrates clear malversation within the media funded
Australian Press Council, not been acted upon? [ref: Media Section]

29. Why did the Government of Queensland provide over $500,000 of
taxpayer revenue for the production of a telemovie which was based upon a
discredited and defamatory source, and which pointed fingers away from
politicians and the AFP, and at a dead man instead (Schapelle Corby’s
father)? When this contribution was found to have been misappropriated,
in direct breach of the official terms of trade, why did the state
government ignore demands for both an open and criminal investigation?
Why did the Queensland Government refer public complaints about this to
Michael Keelty’s CCC, when the CCC itself was a subject of the very same
complaint? Why has the Federal Government refused to intervene in this
affair? [ref: Misappropiation Report]
30. Why has the huge FOI
catalogue of ministerial correspondence, official transcripts, and
departmental cables, which incontrovertibly proves every word stated the
above, been ignored by the establishment, including all elected
The answers to all these
questions are provided by the official materials referred to in Question
30, which are published on the Expendable Project’s website (, but censored by the mainstream media.

The motives and ruthless self-interest of the AFP and federal
politicians is revealed in the report published on the following web

People For Schapelle Corby

One thought on “People For Schapelle Corby #Icare4innocentSchapelle

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: